Amanda Caswell writes about Claude Fable 5.1, Anthropic's latest high-end model, and proposes a single prompt designed to showcase its agentic capabilities. The prompt asks the model to critique an existing project the user is already working on, identify what's wrong with their thinking, and then refactor or redesign the whole thing while explaining its reasoning at each decision point. Caswell tested it by uploading her entire book manuscript without giving any hints about what she thought was wrong, and found the model preserved her voice while surfacing issues she had missed.
- Features a 1-million-token context window, suited for large codebases and lengthy documents
- Anthropic claims reduced costs on agentic workloads through cheaper caching
- Caswell notes that LLM explanations are justifications, not literal transcripts of internal reasoning
- She contrasts Claude's more questioning approach with ChatGPT and Gemini, which she says tend to execute edits without challenging assumptions
>": I'm building describe a real project you're actually working on, in detail » . Here's my current approach: paste your code, outline, or plan » . Tell me what's wrong with my thinking, what I'm missing, and then refactor or redesign the whole thing — but explain your reasoning at each decision point so I can learn from it."
- Features a 1-million-token context window, suited for large codebases and lengthy documents
- Anthropic claims reduced costs on agentic workloads through cheaper caching
- Caswell notes that LLM explanations are justifications, not literal transcripts of internal reasoning
- She contrasts Claude's more questioning approach with ChatGPT and Gemini, which she says tend to execute edits without challenging assumptions
>": I'm building describe a real project you're actually working on, in detail » . Here's my current approach: paste your code, outline, or plan » . Tell me what's wrong with my thinking, what I'm missing, and then refactor or redesign the whole thing — but explain your reasoning at each decision point so I can learn from it."
A zero-dependency Python CLI tool designed to provide AI coding agents with persistent session memory. It solves the problem of context window degradation and the "lost in the middle" phenomenon by allowing agents to perform efficient, read-only recalls from local SQLite session stores. Instead of burning thousands of tokens on project exploration or re-orientation, auto-memory enables targeted retrieval of recent files and task history using minimal token overhead.
Key features and technical details:
- Zero dependencies using only Python standard libraries.
- Read-only access to Copilot CLI's local SQLite database to ensure safety.
- Progressive disclosure mechanism ranging from cheap scans (~50 tokens) to full session details.
- Schema-aware design with built-in validation for tool updates.
- Compatible with GitHub Copilot CLI, Claude Code, Cursor, and other instruction-file supporting agents.
Key features and technical details:
- Zero dependencies using only Python standard libraries.
- Read-only access to Copilot CLI's local SQLite database to ensure safety.
- Progressive disclosure mechanism ranging from cheap scans (~50 tokens) to full session details.
- Schema-aware design with built-in validation for tool updates.
- Compatible with GitHub Copilot CLI, Claude Code, Cursor, and other instruction-file supporting agents.
The /llms.txt file is a proposal to standardize a method for providing LLMs with concise, expert-level information about a website. It addresses the limitations of LLM context windows by offering a dedicated markdown file containing background information, guidance, and links to detailed documentation. The format is designed to be both human and machine readable, enabling fixed processing methods. The proposal includes generating markdown versions of existing HTML pages (appending .md to the URL). This initiative aims to improve LLM performance in various applications, from software documentation to complex legal analysis, and is already being implemented in projects like FastHTML and nbdev.
A post with pithy observations and clear conclusions from building complex LLM workflows, covering topics like prompt chaining, data structuring, model limitations, and fine-tuning strategies.
